We provide clients with many professional and technical services. For a detailed description, please select the relevant service.
The AASB is finalising its changes to the accounting by not-for-profit (“NFP”) entities for donations, grants, contributions and contract revenue through the introduction of two, as yet unnumbered, new standards:
Together, these standards will change and clarify when a NFP entity obtains control of a resource and, hence, recognises an asset and when the receipt of that asset results in the recognition of income.
In essence, a NFP entity recognises an asset (which is defined as a resource obtained by the entity) when it obtains control of that resource. The asset received by the entity can take the form of cash; other financial assets such as bonds or shares in other entities; physical assets such as land & buildings; intangible assets such as intellectual property; and includes the right to use an asset under a lease. That asset is initially measured at its fair value.
Currently, a NFP lessee that pays either nominal or below-market lease payments in an operating lease would only recognise a lease expense based on those actual lease payments. Consequently, a NFP lessee would recognise neither an asset nor a lease expense in respect of leases where the payments were zero, nominal or ‘peppercorn’.
Furthermore, under existing standards, a NFP entity is only required to recognise acquisitions of property, plant and equipment or intangible asset at fair value where they are acquired at no or nominal consideration. Otherwise, those assets are recognised at their cost of acquisition.
However, under the new standards, those assets obtained by the NFP entity must be initially recognised at fair value. Hence, the entity will be required to:
This new requirement to recognise the effects of below-market leases is a significant change from current practice and will require NFPs to consider whether their current lease arrangements will be affected.
Sometimes a customer may enter into a contract with a NFP entity with a dual purpose of obtaining goods or services and donating assets to the entity. The AASB debated whether donation elements should be separately identified and accounted for in all customer contracts. Identifying potential donation elements in all customer contracts involving NFPs would be unreasonably onerous. Finally, the AASB agreed to introduce a rebuttable presumption that the transaction price of a contract relates wholly to the satisfaction of performance obligations within the contract unless a separately identifiable component of the contract consideration is non-refundable.
For example, School A charges new students a non-refundable enrolment fee of $5,000 in addition to the term one tuition fee of $1,000. In this scenario, the presumption is rebutted because the enrolment fee is separately identifiable and non-refundable. Hence, the donation element of $5,000 is recognised by School A as income on receipt and tuition fees of $1,000 is recognised as income over time as it provides education services during term one. Alternatively, School B charges new students term one tuition fees of $6,000. In this case, the presumption is not rebutted because there is no separately identifiable non-refundable donation element. Consequently, School B recognises income of $6,000 over time as it provides education services during term one.
The general principle in AASB 10XX is that the entity recognises, as income immediately, the difference between the fair value of the asset received and any amount separately recognised as either:
General gifts, donations and bequests or grants that do not impose specific stipulations on their use or contain refund obligations are not expected to give rise to a liability within the scope of AASB 9, AASB 15 or AASB 137. Hence, such amounts are recognised immediately as income when the entity obtains control of the asset.
However, to the extent that the transfer to the NFP either:
the entity initially recognises a liability for that amount and will recognise income as or when those obligations are satisfied. In essence, to defer income recognition the entity must have enforceable performance obligations of sufficiently specificity to enable an assessment of whether, and when, the entity has satisfied those obligations. In the absence of those characteristics, income is recognised immediately.
The draft standards contain specific rules relating to capital grants. Where an entity receives a grant for the purpose of acquiring or constructing a non-financial asset to particular specifications or conditions (for example, a grant to construct low income community housing to government specifications), income is recognised as or when it satisfies its obligations to construct that asset.
Although the new revenue standard, AASB 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers will apply to for-profit entities from 1 January 2018, for not-for-profit entities both AASB 15 and the new NFP standards only apply to reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019.
On transition to the new standards, a NFP entity can elect to apply the standards either:
The AASB will issue final draft standards during September for a 30-day public comment period. The standards will contain a number of illustrative examples to assist entities apply the concepts in the standards. We encourage all NFP entities to provide the AASB with their views on the final drafts.
To find out how we can assist you analyse the effects of the new standards on your organisation, please contact Jamie Dreckow or your Nexia Edwards Marshall Advisor.
The material contained in this publication is for general information purposes only and does not constitute professional advice or recommendation from Nexia Edwards Marshall. Regarding any situation or circumstance, specific professional advice should be sought on any particular matter by contacting your Nexia Edwards Marshall advisor.